Speech to inform Outline Rubric Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Speech to inform Outline Rubric - Essay Example . I tend to behave differently when I visit my parents’ households. In my opinion maintaining one’s culture is a crucial part of life, it sort of gives any individual an identity unique from others. In my family, my mother is African while my Father is from Saudi Arabia. This definitely makes me multiracial. Nonetheless, I tend to be more with my father’s culture since we reside with them and I have stayed with them longer than my mother’s family. The discourses can be diverse but at some point similar in terms of values. Following all these, I also have been affected in school since I come from different races. I will therefore take you through my experiences from both cultures for a better understanding of their discourse. I will explain the similarities as well as differences between the two, and the impact they both have had in my life especially when I was growing up. Transition: Despite the many differences with the two discourse cultures, they share a number of similar values which in my opinion make them compatible to intermarry, as my parents did. Here are some of the similarities. Transition: As I have explained, Discourse culture basically brings out the difference in the culture of communities. My Saudi Arabian and African discourses have their differences and similarities also they have had some negative effects on me. It is my hope that through my multiracial identity you now comprehend what discourse culture is. The two cultures are different in some way especially when visiting other people but have similarities. Respect for family unity is a similar in both of my races. I have been discriminated but have survived it all since I love both my mother and father so dearly. My challenge to all of you is to stop racism, if anyone of you still believes in discrimination upon race then this is a reason on why you should see the world and the people in it differently. We cannot all be the same and

Korean American-Q2A Article Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Korean American-Q2A - Article Example Social capital just as the name suggests refers to the value of the social network in a society. Such features local churches, entrepreneurship and ethnic networks played an integral role in facilitating the settlement of Korean immigrants in the United States. Such forms of social capital cushioned the first-generation immigrants with vital resources thereby enabling them to take their children to school. Most of such families are in the middle class. However, the systematic weakening of the social capital is a vital feature responsible for the disparity in the Korean youth education. Such social networks weakened thereby leaving the modern day Korean American youths vulnerable to such social vices as racism that continue to hamper their attempt to seek education. Schools in America strive to provide a number of the basic resources. However, the number of Korean American students that drop out of high school continues to rise. Korean American children who live in poor and isolated neighborhoods continue to drop out of schools owing to the vulnerability they feel while in the schools. The schools do not provide the students with adequate support services that make settling in such schools difficult for them. Socio-economic background is yet another equally important factor that influences the receipt of education services in the country. Most of the post-1965, Korean immigrants lacked effective social capital. This exposed them to the economic forces of the country. Most of such families live in poverty and in isolated neighborhoods where they cannot access any formidable social network. Their socio-economic state makes it difficult for the youth to pursue education as most of them drop school due to the harsh social environment and the eviden t lack of resources. Such youths resort to drug abuse as most of them join the illegal trade of drugs. In retrospect,

THe Role of Women in the World Essay Example for Free

THe Role of Women in the World Essay The development of a country is very dependent on the roles and freedom that women receive. The gender role do vary geographically between More Developed countries (MDCs) and less developed countries(LDC’s). In less developed countries women take on lower roles, and lower stand in the social class. But geographically, in MDCs women have power and can have higher jobs. This gap is the piece that need to be studied to fully comprehend the changing of the role between the men and the women. One way the role of women is changing through the world is the women are gaining empowerment. Because of this, they are starting to hold high respectable jobs. This empowerment is a huge change because instead of women doing minuscule jobs as done before, the women are in office and leading countries. This is change because originally the men held these jobs. Because countries are developing and as countries developed thee status of women increases, the change can over all be described as countries becoming more developed. Over all in the world, the trend is found when countries allow the women rights, there country develops. Another way how the role of women is changing is women are now starting to become more educated. Read more:Â  Women Role in Modern Society This is a big role change because women have always had very few people of their gender in school. This is primarily because of their role has been to work at home and take care of all the minuscule jobs around the house. As their country develops, the role has changed and now they can obtain an education and have more freedom. One example of a less developed countries stats of men to women in school is In Arab states, they have 73 males but only 51 females. This shows that as countries develop they will have more equality between men and women in schools. There role of women has changed dramatically. The world trend for the development of a country is characterized by how women are treated and their roles in society. Gender related Development index is another tool used to explain that the roles are changing. This index compiles of economic indications of gender differences, social indications of gender difference, and demography indication of genetic differences, This index shows how the role has changed because this directly corresponds to woman empowerment. This empowerment allows women to get educated rather than do mine minuscular jobs, and to take office or to undertake the jobs that men once only had.

Humanity as a Bridge :: essays research papers

  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  People of the world are very different in many ways, and yet similarities exist. Many languages are spoken, many religions are practiced, but we have one 1 thing in common, humanity. By definition, humanity is what makes us part of the human race. Humanity is like a universal bridge, connecting groups of people to each other. Without humanity, you have many groups stranded like islands. We have to celebrate this bridge, and allow others to cross it, to experience our different cultures. We can use this knowledge of our various cultures to improve ourselves as human beings. If we're not improving, then we are taking a step back, enough steps back and we will eventually come back to where we started from. Instead we should take steps forward, crossing this bridge and uniting with the people on the other side. Uniting with people is essential to stop unwanted accidental misunderstand. Those that are not united are not familiar with each other, and those that are unf amiliar with each other have more differences, and when differences exist, conflicts arise. With conflicts come wars, with wars come destruction, destruction of the crucial bridges that connect us. If we cross the universal bridge more often, we will virtually eliminate hate and racism, something which we desperately need in this crucial and sensitive time.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  People of the world are very different in many ways, and yet similarities exist. Many languages are spoken, many religions are practiced, but we have one 1 thing in common, humanity. By definition, humanity is what makes us part of the human race. Humanity is like a universal bridge, connecting groups of people to each other. Without humanity, you have many groups stranded like islands. We have to celebrate this bridge, and allow others to cross it, to experience our different cultures. We can use this knowledge of our various cultures to improve ourselves as human beings. If we're not improving, then we are taking a step back, enough steps back and we will eventually come back to where we started from. Instead we should take steps forward, crossing this bridge and uniting with the people on the other side.

Acquisition in Multinational Coperation Essay

Purpose – This conceptual paper aims to draw upon recent complexity and organizational psychology literature to examine conï ¬â€šict episodes, exploring the limitations of the predominant research paradigm that treats conï ¬â€šict episodes as occurring in sequence, as discrete isolated incidents. Design/methodology/approach – The paper addresses a long-standing issue in conï ¬â€šict management research, which is that the predominant typology of conï ¬â€šict is confusing. The complexity perspective challenges the fundamental paradigm, which has dominated research in the conï ¬â€šict ï ¬ eld, in which conï ¬â€šict episodes occur in sequence and in isolation, with managers using one predominant form of conï ¬â€šict resolution behavior. Findings – The ï ¬ ndings are two-fold: ï ¬ rst, the behavioral strategies adopted in the management of these conï ¬â€šicts will be highly complex and will be determined by a number of inï ¬â€šuencing factors; and second, this moves theory beyond the two dimensional duel concern perspective, in that the adaptable manager dealing with these multiple, simultaneous conï ¬â€šicts will also need to consider the possible implications of their chosen strategy along with the changing micro environment in which they operate. Originality/value – This paper adds value to the ï ¬ eld of conï ¬â€šict theory by moving beyond two dimensions and exploring a sequential contingency perspective for conï ¬â€šict management within the organization. It argues that multiple conï ¬â€šict episodes can occur simultaneously, requiring managers to use differing behaviors for successful conï ¬â€šict management. Keywords Conï ¬â€šict management, Conï ¬â€šict resolution, Organizational conï ¬â€šict, Individual behaviour, Interpersonal relations Paper type Conceptual paper International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management Vol. 21 No. 2, 2010 pp. 186-201 q Emerald Group Publishing Limited 1044-4068 DOI 10.1108/10444061011037404 Introduction It is now over 40 years since Louis Pondy (1967) wrote his seminal article on conï ¬â€šict within the organization and its management and almost 20 years since his reï ¬â€šections on his earlier work were published (Pondy, 1989)[1]. In 1967 Pondy established what was for two decades the generally accepted paradigm of conï ¬â€šict: that conï ¬â€šict episodes occur as temporary disruptions to the otherwise cooperative relationships which make up the organization (Pondy, 1967). In his subsequent reï ¬â€šections on his earlier work and that of others, Pondy proposed that conï ¬â€šict is an inherent feature of organizational life, rather than an occasional breakdown of cooperation (Pondy, 1989). This radically challenged the previous paradigm. Indeed, Pondy (1989) even suggested that research into the phenomenon of cooperation within the organization could be beneï ¬ cial in providing further insight into conï ¬â€šict within the organization, implying that it was cooperation, not conï ¬â€šict, which was the anomalous state requiring investigation. Yet, for almost two decades, Pondy’s conceptualization of conï ¬â€šict as a natural state for the organization has remained largely unexplored despite the emergence of a complexity perspective which explores multiple elements of the conï ¬â€šict situation or cooperative state. One possible reason why Pondy’s challenge has not been answered is that some confusion has arisen over the terms and typologies used for the classiï ¬ cation of conï ¬â€šict episodes. Consequently, debates about conï ¬â€šict structure or composition have tended to dominate the research agenda. The potential for confusion arising from these various conï ¬â€šict classiï ¬ cations will be discussed in this paper. Where conï ¬â€šict management behaviors have been studied, researchers have tended to focus on a two-dimensional approach or â€Å"dual concern theory† model (Thomas, 1976) which suggests that individuals adopt conï ¬â€šict management behaviors based on their perceived self interests and those of others; i.e. concern for self (competitive behaviors) versus concern for other (accommodating behaviors). Although this approach to the research of conï ¬â€šict and its management ï ¬ ts well with Pondy’s (1967) original paradigm, it is challenged by the complexity perspective that has emerged in psychology research. The complexity perspective of intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict maintains that interpersonal relationships are more complex than hitherto thought, and that the unfolding conï ¬â€šict is inï ¬â€šuenced by a wide variety of conditions. Moreover the complexity perspective encourages the consideration of simultaneous complexity (more than one event occurring simultaneously) and of how the mode of conï ¬â€šict management affects the outcomes (Munduate et al., 1999). This fresh perspective has enabled researchers to examine the point at which behavioral style is changed and the effect on the conï ¬â€šict episode (Olekalns et al., 1996) and to look at how different behaviors are combined (Janssen et al., 1999). With the recent developments in the complexity perspective of conï ¬â€šict management research (Van de Vliert et al., 1997; Munduate et al., 1999), the time has come to further explore the possible consequences of the complexity perspective: whether it is in fact the case that conï ¬â€šict is an inherent condition within the organization (Pondy, 1989); whether conï ¬â€šict episodes do not occur in isolation but occur frequently and simultaneously (Euwema et al., 2003); and whether complex sequences of adaptive behaviors are required to continually manage the constantly changing intraorganizational, conï ¬â€šict environment. Before we can do this, and to provide a common ground for discourse, we ï ¬ rst need to examine some of the theories around conï ¬â€šict typology that have arisen in the psychology and management literature and which may be the cause of some confusion. Conï ¬â€šict terms and typologies â€Å"Conï ¬â€šict† is a broad construct that has been studied extensively across several disciplines covering a wide range of social interactions. Previous conï ¬â€šict research has identiï ¬ ed four main levels of conï ¬â€šict in the context of human behavior and relationships as summarized by Lewecki et al. (2003): (1) Intergroup conï ¬â€šicts between groups of individuals which can range in size and complexity due to the many relationships involved, including international conï ¬â€šict between nations. (2) Intragroup or intraorganizational conï ¬â€šicts arising within smaller groups which comprise the organization. A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory 187 IJCMA 21,2 188 (3) Interpersonal conï ¬â€šict; that is, conï ¬â€šict at an individual level, conï ¬â€šict between individuals, or conï ¬â€šict between an individual and a group. (4) Intrapersonal conï ¬â€šict on a personal level, where the conï ¬â€šict occurs in one’s own mind. Although these four levels of conï ¬â€šict all appear across both the psychology and management literature, it is the third level (interpersonal conï ¬â€šicts within the organization or the reactions an individual or group has to the perception that two parties have aspirations that cannot be achieved simultaneously) that has become the central ï ¬ eld of research within the organization (Putnem and Poole, 1987). In 1992, Thomas proposed a simpliï ¬ ed deï ¬ nition of interpersonal conï ¬â€šict as the process which begins when an individual or group feels negatively affected by another individual or group. The conï ¬â€šict consists of a perception of barriers to achieving one’s goals (Thomas, 1992). More recently, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict has been deï ¬ ned as an individual’s perceptions of incompatibilities, differences in views or interpersonal incompatibility (Jehn, 1997). Conï ¬â€šict at this level has mostly been seen as adversarial and as having a negative effect upon relationships (Ford et al., 1975). These deï ¬ nitions presuppose that an opposition or incompatibility is perceived by both parties, that some interaction is taking place, and that both parties are able to inï ¬â€šuence or get involved – that is. that there is some degree of interdependence (Medina et al., 2004). Interpersonal conï ¬â€šict could arise within organizations where, for example, customer-facing departments such as Sales make promises to customers that other departments then have to deliver. In this domain of intraorganizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict, both Pondy’s (1966, 1967) work and recent developments adopting the complexity perspective are of particular interest This broad area of intraorganizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict has been further subdivided into two types: relationship conï ¬â€šict and task conï ¬â€šict. Relationship conï ¬â€šict arises between the actors through their subjective emotional positions, whereas task conï ¬â€šict relates primarily to the more objective tasks or issues involved (Reid et al., 2004). A series of studies conï ¬ rmed this duality between relationship and task. Wall and Nolan (1986) identiï ¬ ed â€Å"people oriented† versus â€Å"task oriented† conï ¬â€šict. In the early to mid-1990s Priem and Price (1991), Pinkley and Northcraft (1994), Jehn (1995) and Sessa (1996) all identiï ¬ ed â€Å"relationship† and â€Å"task† as discrete aspects of conï ¬â€šict. The picture became rather more complicated in the late 1990s. In 1995 Amason et al. redeï ¬ ned conï ¬â€šict types as â€Å"affective† and â€Å"cognitive† and in 1999 Van de Vliert further redeï ¬ ned these types as â€Å"task† and â€Å"person† conï ¬â€šict. In working toward a more comprehensive model of intraorganizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict, Jameson (1999) suggested three dimensions for conï ¬â€šict: (1) content; (2) relational; and (3) situational. The content dimension encompasses the previously discussed conï ¬â€šict types (affective, cognitive, relationship etc) while the relational dimension considers the subjective, perceived variables within the relationships of the actors involved: . trust; . status; . . . . A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory seriousness; degree of interdependence; record of success; and the number of actors involved. The situational dimension examines the variables which may be most relevant in selecting an appropriate conï ¬â€šict management strategy. These include time pressure, the potential impact of the conï ¬â€šict episode, the degree of escalation and the range of options available in the management of the conï ¬â€šict episode (Jameson, 1999). Meanwhile, Sheppard (1992) criticized the multiplicity of terms that were being used to describe types of interpersonal conï ¬â€šict, and the needless confusion that this caused. The result of the many approaches described above is that there is no general model for the typology of interpersonal conï ¬â€šict within the organization. In the absence of such a model, other researchers have taken different approaches, using the antecedents of the conï ¬â€šict episode to describe conï ¬â€šict types. Examples of this proliferation include role conï ¬â€šict (Walker et al., 1975), gender conï ¬â€šict (Cheng, 1995) and goal conï ¬â€šict (Tellefsen and Eyuboglu, 2002). This proliferation of terms or typologies has unsurprisingly led to confusion, most noticeably with the term â€Å"interpersonal conï ¬â€šict† being used to describe purely relationship or emotional conï ¬â€šict (Bradford et al., 2004) or conï ¬â€šict being deï ¬ ned in terms of emotion only, adding to the wide range of terms already used (Bodtker and Jameson, 2001). Thus, at a time when international, interorganizational, intraorganizational, interpersonal and intrapersonal conï ¬â€šicts are being extensively studied with conï ¬â€šict deï ¬ ned and operationalized in a variety of ways, no widely accepted and consistent model has emerged to shape conï ¬â€šict research (Reid et al., 2004). Table I summarizes the many different conï ¬â€šict typologies that have been proposed. Table I illustrates that relationship and task conï ¬â€šict are almost universally accepted as distinct types of interpersonal conï ¬â€šict by psychology and management researchers. Date Author(s) Conï ¬â€šict typology 1986 1991 1994 1995 1995 1996 1996 1997 1999 1999 2000 2000 2002 2003 2003 2004 2004 2005 Wall and Nolan Priem and Price Pinkley and Northcraft Jehn Amason et al. Sessa Amason Amason and Sapienza Jameson Janssen et al. Friedman et al. Jehn and Chatman Tellefsen and Eyuboglu Bradford et al. De Dreu and Weingart Reid et al. Tidd et al. Guerra et al. People oriented, task oriented Relationship, task Relationship, task Relationship, task Cognitive, affective Task, person oriented Affective, cognitive Affective, cognitive Content, relational, situational Task, person oriented Relationship, task Task, relationship, process Goal conï ¬â€šicts Interpersonal, task Relationship, task Relationship, task Relationship, task Relationship, task 189 Table I. A summary of the typologies of conï ¬â€šict IJCMA 21,2 190 In addition, many researchers have identiï ¬ ed a third type of conï ¬â€šict which relates to the environment in which managers operate, described as situational conï ¬â€šict ( Jameson, 1999) or process conï ¬â€šict ( Jehn and Chatman, 2000). We believe that a consistent conï ¬â€šict typology is called for, to aid future research into the complex nature of intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict. In this paper, we propose that future researchers should recognize three types of interpersonal conï ¬â€šict. However, since the terms â€Å"relationship† and â€Å"task† are vulnerable to misinterpretation we advocate using the terms affective and cognitive (following Amason, 1996 and Amason and Sapienza, 1997), in conjunction with process (Jehn and Chatman, 2000), to describe the three types of interpersonal conï ¬â€šict. These terms, which reï ¬â€šect the more speciï ¬ c terminology used in the psychology literature, are deï ¬ ned in Table II. As Table II shows, the t ypology we propose is as follows. Affective Conï ¬â€šict is a term describing conï ¬â€šicts concerned with what people think and feel about their relationships including such dimensions as trust, status and degree of interdependence (Amason and Sapienza, 1997). Cognitive Conï ¬â€šict describes conï ¬â€šicts concerned with what people know and understand about their task, roles and functions. Process Conï ¬â€šict relates to conï ¬â€šicts arising from the situational context, the organization structure, strategy or culture (Amason and Sapienza, 1997; Jehn and Chatman, 2000). Using this typology for conï ¬â€šict between individuals or groups of individuals within the organization avoids confusion over the use of the terms â€Å"interpersonal†, â€Å"person† or â€Å"relationship† often used when referring to affective conï ¬â€šict, while task conï ¬â€šict is clearly distinguished from process conï ¬â€šict, addressing all the issues previously outlined. These terms will therefore be used throughout the remainder of t his paper. Having argued that taxonomic confusion has hindered conï ¬â€šict research through the misuse of existing taxonomies (Bradford et al., 2004) or where language has resulted in the use of different terms to describe the same conï ¬â€šict type (see Table I), we now move on to consider the implications or consequences of intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict and whether it is always negative or can have positive consequences (De Dreu, 1997). Consequences of conï ¬â€šict: functional or dysfunctional? Some researchers exploring attitudes towards conï ¬â€šict have considered the consequences of conï ¬â€šict for individual and team performance (Jehn, 1995) and have found that interpersonal conï ¬â€šict can have either functional (positive) or dysfunctional (negative) outcomes for team and individual performance (e.g. Amason, 1996). Moreover, the consequences of conï ¬â€šict can be perceived and felt in different ways by different actors experiencing the conï ¬â€šict episode (Jehn and Chatman, 2000). Thus, conï ¬â€šict is situationally and perceptually relative. Conï ¬â€šict type Affective Table II. A proposed taxonomy of conï ¬â€šict Deï ¬ nition Conï ¬â€šicts concerned with what people think and feel about their relationships with other individuals or groups Cognitive Conï ¬â€šicts concerned with what people know and understand about their task Process Conï ¬â€šicts arising from the situational context, the organization structure, strategy or culture The traditional view of conï ¬â€šict takes the view that conï ¬â€šict exists in opposition to co-operation and that conï ¬â€šict is wholly dysfunctional, putting the focus on resolution rather than management (e.g. Pondy, 1966). This perspective can be traced forward to more recent work. Where conï ¬â€šict is deï ¬ ned as the process which begins when one person or group feels negatively affected by another (Thomas, 1992), there is an implication of obstruction to either party achieving their goals, which is readily interpreted negatively. This can result in conï ¬â€šict avoidance or suppression of conï ¬â€šict management behavior, leading to perceived negative consequences on team or individual performance (De Dreu, 1997). Negatively-perceived conï ¬â€šict episodes can increase tension and antagonism between individuals and lead to a lack of focus on the required task (Saavedra et al., 1993; Wall and Nolan, 1986) while avoidance and suppression can also have long term nega tive consequences such as stiï ¬â€šing creativity, promoting groupthink and causing an escalation in any existing conï ¬â€šict (De Dreu, 1997). Not surprisingly, where interdependence is negative (where one party wins at the expense of the other although they have some dependency in their relationship) any conï ¬â€šict will be viewed negatively (Janssen et al., 1999). The perception of conï ¬â€šict will also be negative where the conï ¬â€šict is personal, resulting in personality clashes, increased stress and frustration. This type of relationship conï ¬â€šict can impede the decision-making process as individuals focus on the personal aspects rather than the task related issues (Jehn, 1995). In contrast to the somewhat negative perception of intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict outlined above, more recent conï ¬â€šict management theory has begun to suggest that certain types of conï ¬â€šict can have a positive effect upon relationships and that the best route to this outcome is through acceptance of, and effective management of, inevitable conï ¬â€šict, rather than through conï ¬â€šict avoidance or suppression (De Dreu, 1997). When individuals are in conï ¬â€šict they have to address major issues, be more creative, and see different aspects of a problem. These challenges can mitigate groupthink and stimulate creativity (De Dreu, 1997). Naturally, where there is high positive interdependence (an agreeable outcome for both parties), the conï ¬â€šict episode will be viewed much more positively (Janssen et al., 1999). Moreover, Jehn (1995) has suggested that task- and issue-based cognitive con ï ¬â€šict can have a positive effect on team performance. Groups who experience cognitive conï ¬â€šict have a greater understanding of the assignments at hand and are able to make better decisions in dealing with issues as they arise (Simons and Peterson, 2000). For example, research has shown that, when individuals are exposed to a â€Å"devil’s advocate†, they are able to make better judgments than those not so exposed (Schwenk, 1990). Schulz-Hardt et al. (2002) suggested that groups make better decisions where they started in disagreement rather than agreement. In these examples, conï ¬â€šict has a functional (useful and positive) outcome. We have argued that the notion of functional conï ¬â€šict has shifted the ï ¬ eld of conï ¬â€šict research away from conï ¬â€šict resolution and towards consideration of the management behaviors which can be adopted in dealing with conï ¬â€šict in order to gain the best possible outcome (De Dreu, 1997; Euwema et al., 2003 ). Next, we examine research into conï ¬â€šict management behaviors and explore some of the managerial tools that have been developed to help managers to deal with intraorganizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict. Conï ¬â€šict management behaviors Conï ¬â€šict management can be deï ¬ ned as the actions in which a person typically engages, in response to perceived interpersonal conï ¬â€šict, in order to achieve a desired goal A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory 191 IJCMA 21,2 192 (Thomas, 1976). Demonstrably, conï ¬â€šict management pays off: previous research has indicated that it is the way in which conï ¬â€šict episodes are addressed which determines the outcome (Amason, 1996). However, there is disagreement between researchers as to the degree to which managers can and do adopt different conï ¬â€šict management behaviors. Previous research has considered three different approaches: the â€Å"one best way† perspective (Sternberg and Soriano, 1984); the contingency or situational perspective (Thomas, 1992; Munduate et al., 1999; Nicotera, 1993); and the complexity or conglomerated perspective (Van de Vliert et al., 1999; Euwema et al., 2003). Arguably the simplest perspective on conï ¬â€šict management behavior is the â€Å"one best way† perspective (Sternberg and Soriano, 1984), which agues that one conï ¬â€šict management style or behavior (collaboration) is more effective than any other. However, it argues that individuals have a parti cular preferred behavioral predisposition to the way in which they handle conï ¬â€šict. Thus, from the â€Å"one best way† perspective, the conï ¬â€šict-avoiding manager may have a behavioral predisposition to avoidance strategies, whereas the accommodating manager may prefer accommodating solutions. In this paradigm, the most constructive solution is considered to be collaboration, since collaboration is always positively interdependent – it has a joint best outcome, generally described as â€Å"win/win† (Van de Vliert et al., 1997). The â€Å"one best way† approach suggests that a more aggressive, competitive, negatively interdependent approach (in fact, any conï ¬â€šict management approach other than collaborative) can result in suboptimal outcomes (Janssen et al., 1999). However, the â€Å"one best way† perspective raises more questions than it answers. It does not explain how managers are able to collaborate if they have a different behavioral predisposition, nor does it provide evidence that collaboration always produces the best outcome (Thomas, 1992). A more general problem with the â€Å"one best way† approach is that it may not be very useful: if managers truly have little or no control over their approach to conï ¬â€šict management, the practical applications are limited. The â€Å"one best way† perspective does not consider the passage of time, that behaviors could be changed or modiï ¬ ed during any interaction, nor the effect any previous encounters may have on the current experience (Van de Vliert et al., 1997). Moving beyond the â€Å"one best way† perspective, in which only collaborative behaviors are considered to provide the most desirable outcome, the contingency perspective maintains that the optimal conï ¬â€šict management behavior depends on the speciï ¬ c conï ¬â€šict situation, and that what is appropriate in one situation may not be appropriate in another (Thomas, 1992). In this paradigm, the best approach is dependent upon the particular set of circumstances. The implications, which are very different to the â€Å"one best way† perspective, are that individuals can and should select the conï ¬â€šict management behavior that is most likely to produce the desired outcome. Thus, conï ¬â€šict management behaviors are regarded as a matter of preference (rather than innate, as in the â€Å"one best way† view), and the outcome is dependent on the selection of the most appropriate mode of conï ¬â€šict management behavior. Until recently, conï ¬â€šict research has been heavily inï ¬â€šuenced by the â€Å"one best way† and contingency perspectives, focusing on the effectiveness of a single mode of conï ¬â€šict management behavior (primarily collaboration) during a single conï ¬â€šict episode (Sternberg and Soriano, 1984). Thus the â€Å"one best way† and contingency perspectives do not necessarily o ffer a real-world view in which managers both can and do change their behaviors: adapting to the situation; perhaps trying different approaches to break a deadlock or to improve their bargaining position; taking into account changing circumstances in the microenvironment; and the subsequent inï ¬â€šuence upon the actions of individuals involved in any conï ¬â€šict episode (Olekalns et al., 1996). A fresh approach is provided by the complexity perspective, which characterizes conï ¬â€šicts as being dynamic and multi-dimensional. In such circumstances, the best behavioral style in dealing with any one conï ¬â€šict episode may vary during, or between, conï ¬â€šict episodes (Medina et al., 2004; Nicotera, 1993). For conï ¬â€šict in a complex world, neither the â€Å"one best way† nor the contingency perspective would necessarily produce optimal results. If conï ¬â€šict does not occur discretely and individually (Pondy, 1992a), existing approaches may not describe the world as managers actually experience it. Arguably, these approaches have artiï ¬ cially limited conï ¬â€šict research to a ï ¬â€šat, two-dimensional model. To address the shortcomings of traditional research and to incorporate the complexity perspective into conï ¬â€šict management theory, we need to move beyond two dimensions (Van de Vliert et al., 1997). Beyond two dimensions of conï ¬â€šict management theory Recent work by Van de Vliert et al. (1997) and Medina et al. (2004) has expanded current theory through consideration of the complexity perspective. The complexity perspective argues that any reaction to a conï ¬â€šict episode consists of multiple behavioral components rather than one single conï ¬â€šict management behavior. In the complexity perspective, using a mixture of accommodating, avoiding, competing, compromising and collaborating behaviors throughout the conï ¬â€šict episode is considered to be the rule rather than the exception (Van de Vliert et al., 1997). To date, studies taking a complexity approach to conï ¬â€šict management have adopted one of three different complexity perspectives. The ï ¬ rst examines simultaneous complexity and how different combinations of behaviors affect the outcome of the conï ¬â€šict (Munduate et al., 1999). The second complexity approach focuses on the point of behavioral change and the outcome, examining either the behavioral phases through which the participants of a conï ¬â€šict episode pass, or apply temporal complexity to look at the point at which behavioral style changes and the effect on the conï ¬â€šict episode (Olekalns et al., 1996). The third approach is the sequential complexity or conglomerated perspective, which is concerned with the different modes of conï ¬â€šict management behavior, how they are combined, and at what point they change during the interaction. The application of the complexity perspective to conï ¬â€šict management research has revealed that managers use more than the ï ¬ ve behaviors suggested by the â€Å"one best way† perspective to manage conï ¬â€šict. In their study of conglomerated conï ¬â€šict management behavior, Euwema et al. (2003) argued that the traditional approach under-represents the individual’s assertive modes of behavior and have as a result added â€Å"confronting† and â€Å"process controlling†, making seven possible behaviors: (1) competing; (2) collaborating; (3) avoiding; (4) compromising; (5) accommodating; A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory 193 IJCMA 21,2 194 (6) confronting; and (7) process controlling. Weingart et al. (1990) identiï ¬ ed two types of sequential pattern: Reciprocity, responding to the other party with the same behavior; and Complementarity, responding with an opposing behavior. Applying a complexity perspective, the effectiveness of complementarity or reciprocity behaviors will be contingent upon the situation, the micro-environment, the number of conï ¬â€šict episodes, and the types of conï ¬â€šict present. The sequential pattern may in itself be complex, being dependent both upon the current situation and on varying behaviors throughout the interaction. A further, often unrecognized implication of complexity in conï ¬â€šict is that each conï ¬â€šict episode could be unique, being composed of different proportions of each of the affective, cognitive and process conï ¬â€šict types (Jehn and Chatman, 2000). The implication for conï ¬â€šict management strategy and the choice of the most appropriate behavior is immense. Therefore, a new perspective is needed, in which conï ¬â€šict and the response to conï ¬â€šict is viewed as dynamic and changing over time, with each conï ¬â€šict episode having a unique composition requiring a speciï ¬ c but ï ¬â€šexible approach in order to obtain the best possible outcome. We propose that this might result in a manager changing behavior during a conï ¬â€šict episode, or indeed a manager adopting different behaviors for a number of conï ¬â€šict episodes occurring simultaneously. In the next section, we take all these complex factors into account and propose a single, dynamic and comprehensive model of conï ¬â€šict management behavior. Multiple, simultaneous conï ¬â€šict episodes We have shown that the ï ¬ eld of conï ¬â€šict has become entangled in multiple terms and that research into conï ¬â€šict management is struggling to reconcile two-dimensional models with the more complex situation encountered in the real world. A model is needed which considers the complexity of conï ¬â€šict episodes and separates conï ¬â€šict antecedents from conï ¬â€šict types, recognizing that conï ¬â€šict can relate to emotions and situations which have common antecedents. We propose that the way forward is to expand the conglomerated perspective into a sequential contingency perspective, in which the sequence of conï ¬â€šict management behaviors adopted is dependent upon a number of inï ¬â€šuencing factors in the micro-environment, the number of conï ¬â€šict episodes being dealt with, their composition, and changes in the behaviors of the actors involved. A sequential contingency perspective The sequential contingency perspective for intraorganizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict proposes the adoption of an alternative paradigm which is that conï ¬â€šict is ever-present and ever-changing in terms of its nature or composition; and that it is the way in which these continuous conï ¬â€šicts is managed which determines the outcome of any conï ¬â€šict episode and the nature of any subsequent conï ¬â€šicts. Figure 1 provides a visualization of Pondy’s (1992b) postmodern paradigm of conï ¬â€šict and provides a foundation for the investigation of complex, multiple, simultaneous, intraorganizational conï ¬â€šicts. This conceptual visualization of conï ¬â€šict within the organization provides a three-dimensional representation of conï ¬â€šict from the paradigm that conï ¬â€šict is an inherent feature of organizational life. It shows how, at any one given point in time, A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory 195 Figure 1. A conceptual visualization of multiple, simultaneous conï ¬â€šict there can be a number of conï ¬â€šict episodes experienced (y axis), each with different intensities (z axis) and duration (x axis). In addition, we have argued that each conï ¬â€šict episode will have a unique composition, being made up of different proportions of cognitive, affective and process elements. The implications for conï ¬â€šict management theory are twofold: ï ¬ rst, the behavioral strategies adopted in the management of these conï ¬â€šicts will be highly complex and will be determined by a number of inï ¬â€šuencing factors; and second, this moves theory beyond the two dimensional duel concern perspective, in that the adaptable manager dealing with these multiple, simultaneous conï ¬â€šicts will also need to consider the possible implications of their chosen strategy along with the changing micro environment in which they operate. Using this three-dimensional conceptual visualization of conï ¬â€šict within the organization we propose a sequential contingency model for managing interpersonal conï ¬â€šict within the organization (Figure 2). The basic elements of the framework in Figure 2 consider all the dimensions of conï ¬â€šict and its management as previously discussed: . the conï ¬â€šict episode characteristics, the type and composition of any conï ¬â€šict episode encountered (Amason, 1996; Jehn, 1995; Jehn, 1997; Pinkley and Northcraft, 1994); . the characteristics of the relationship(s) (Jehn, 1995); . the characteristics of the individuals involved; . the conï ¬â€šict management behaviors; and . the outcome of previous conï ¬â€šict episodes (Van de Vliert et al., 1997). IJCMA 21,2 196 Figure 2. A sequential contingency model for managing intra-organizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict The basic postulate of the model is that conï ¬â€šict is a constant and inherent condition of the organization (that is, that conï ¬â€šict episodes do not occur as isolated, anomalous incidents). Additionally, the effectiveness of the conï ¬â€šict management behaviors in terms of its functionality or dysfunctionality is contingent upon, and moderated by, the nature of the conï ¬â€šict, the characteristics of the individuals and relationships involved, and experience of previous conï ¬â€šict. Thus, this model provides a framework for dealing with multiple, simultaneous conï ¬â€šict episodes moving beyond the tradition two-dimensional approach. Future research To date there has been little empirical research into the degree to which individuals are able to adapt their behavior during an interaction, or on the value of the complexity perspective in dealing with complex intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict. The future research agenda needs to explore conï ¬â€šict through Pondy’s (1992b) alternative paradigm and expand on these theoretical ï ¬ ndings by investigating intraorganizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict in a number of ways. We therefore set out a research agenda framed in terms of four research propositions. First, taking the sequential contingency perspective and adopting Pondy’s (1989) alternative paradigm for conï ¬â€šict within the organization, research is needed to establish the occurrence of conï ¬â€šict. Pondy (1992b) argues that, rather than a sequence of discrete isolated incidents, conï ¬â€šict is an inherent condition of social interaction within the organization and that conï ¬â€šict episodes occur simultaneously not sequentially. This would imply that: P1a. Conï ¬â€šict is a constant condition of interorganizational, interpersonal relationships. A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory P1b. Multiple conï ¬â€šict episodes occur simultaneously. P1c. Conï ¬â€šict episodes are complex, having differing compositions of affective, cognitive and process elements which change over time. The complexity perspective recognizes that different conï ¬â€šict situations call for different management behaviors (Van de Vliert et al., 1997). This implies that managers can call upon a much wider range of approaches to conï ¬â€šict management than previously thought. Moreover there is a further implication, which is that managers are able to adapt their behavior during conï ¬â€šict episodes. Thus: P2a. Managers use different behaviors to manage multiple conï ¬â€šicts at any one time. P2b. Managers change their behavior over time during the same conï ¬â€šict episode. A substantial branch of recent conï ¬â€šict management research has focused on the outcomes of conï ¬â€šict and has suggested that not all conï ¬â€šict is negative (De Dreu, 1997; Simons and Peterson, 2000; Schultz-Hardt et al., 2002; Schwenk, 1990). Given this, we need a greater understanding of the effect that the behavior adopted has on the conï ¬â€šict experienced, whether it mitigated or agitated the situation, and the consequences for any subsequent conï ¬â€šict (Amason, 1996). Thus: P3a. The behaviors that managers use affect the outcome of the conï ¬â€šict. P3b. The behaviors that managers use affect subsequent conï ¬â€šicts. Finally, re-visiting Pondy’s (1989) alternative paradigm and incorporating the additional perspectives that come from consideration of conï ¬â€šict outcomes and the application of the complexity perspective, we argue that more research is needed into the relationship between the behaviors that managers adopt and whether these behaviors represent the conscious adaptation of an optimal approach to conï ¬â€šict management. Thus: P4. Conï ¬â€šict management involves adapting a set of behaviors through which a degree of co-operation is maintained, as opposed to the use of behavior(s) which resolve(s) discrete isolated incidents of conï ¬â€šict. Our purpose in setting out a new model and research agenda for conï ¬â€šict management research, together with a set of detailed research propositions, is to move the ï ¬ eld beyond the consideration of conï ¬â€šict episodes as discrete, isolated incidents and to encourage the investigation of different behaviors in different circumstances and their effectiveness. Future research needs to consider the complexity of conï ¬â€šict and adopt a research paradigm which considers the behavioral strategies within long term complex interpersonal relationships. Conclusion This paper has offered four contributions to the ï ¬ eld of conï ¬â€šict and conï ¬â€šict management. The ï ¬ rst is the clariï ¬ cation of conï ¬â€šict typologies set out in Table II. The 197 IJCMA 21,2 198 second contribution is the notion that business managers handle multiple and simultaneous conï ¬â€šict episodes that require different approaches to resolving them, so that the existing models proposed for conï ¬â€šict management are unlikely to chime with their actual experience. The third contribution is to map this in the form of a new theoretical model for conï ¬â€šict management (Figure 2). The fourth contribution is to use this theoretical model to set out a set of research propositions to shape research that will shed light on the real conï ¬â€šicts that managers have to face. Just 40 years on, and intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict theory itself appears to be in conï ¬â€šict. In order to resolve the apparent differences in research approach and perspective researchers need to establish some common ground upon which new theory can be empirically tested, allowing conï ¬â€šict management theory to move beyond two dimensions and to explore complexity whilst adding clarity. N ote 1. First presented at the Academy of Management Meeting, August 14, 1986. References Amason, A. and Sapienza, H. (1997), â€Å"The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conï ¬â€šict†, Journal of Management, Vol. 23 No. 4, pp. 495-516. Amason, A.C. (1996), â€Å"Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conï ¬â€šict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 123-48. Bodtker, A.M. and Jameson, J.K. (2001), â€Å"Emotion in conï ¬â€šict formation and its transformation: application to organizational conï ¬â€šict management†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 259-75. Bradford, K.D., Stringfellow, A. and Weitz, B.A. (2004), â€Å"Managing conï ¬â€šict to improve the effectiveness of retail networks†, Journal of Retailing, Vol. 80 No. 3, pp. 181-95. Cheng, C. (1995), â€Å"Multi-level gender conï ¬â€šict analysis and organizational change†, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 8 No. 6, pp. 26-39. De Dreu, C.K.W. (1997), â€Å"Productive conï ¬â€šict: the importance of conï ¬â€šict management and conï ¬â€šict issue†, in De Dreu, C.K.M. and Van de Vliert, E. (Eds), Using Conï ¬â€šict in Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 9-22. Euwema, M.C., Van de Vliert, E. and Bakker, A.B. (2003), â€Å"Substantive and relational effectiveness of organizational conï ¬â€šict behavior†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 119-39. Ford, N.M., Walker, O.C. Jr and Churchill, G.A. (1975), â€Å"Expectation speciï ¬ c measures of the intersender conï ¬â€šict and role ambiguity experienced by salesmen†, Journal of Business Research, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 95-112. Jameson, J.K. (1999), â€Å"Toward a comprehensive model for the assessment and management of intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict: developing the framework†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 10 No. 3, pp. 268-94. Janssen, O., Van de Vliert, E. and Veenstra, C. (1999), â€Å"How task and person conï ¬â€šict shape the role of positive interdependence in management teams†, Journal of Management, Vol. 25 No. 2, pp. 117-42. Jehn, K.A. (1995), â€Å"A multi-method examination of the beneï ¬ ts and detriments of intragroup conï ¬â€šict†, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40 No. 2, pp. 256-82. Jehn, K.A. (1997), â€Å"A qualitative analysis of conï ¬â€šict types and dimensions in organizational groups†, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 42 No. 3, pp. 530-57. Jehn, K.A. and Chatman, J.A. (2000), â€Å"The inï ¬â€šuence of proportional and perceptual conï ¬â€šict composition on team performance†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 56-73. Lewicki, R., Saunders, D., Barry, B. and Minton, J. (2003), Essentials of Negotiation, 3rd ed., McGraw Hill, Singapore. Medina, J.M., Dorado, M.A., de Cisneros, I.F.J., Arevalo, A. and Munduate, L. (2004), â€Å"Behavioral sequences in the effectiveness of conï ¬â€šict management†, Psychology in Spain, Vol. 8 No. 1, pp. 38-47. Munduate, L., Ganaza, J., Peiro, J.M. and Euwema, M. (1999), â€Å"Patterns of styles in conï ¬â€šict management and effectiveness†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 5-24. Nicotera, A.M. (1993), â€Å"Beyond two dimensions: a grounded theory model of conï ¬â€šict-handling behavior†, Management Communication Quarterly, Vol. 6 No. 3, pp. 282-306. Olekalns, M., Smith, P.L. and Walsh, T. (1996), â€Å"The process of negotiating: strategy and timing as predictors of outcomes†, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 68 No. 1, pp. 68-77. Pinkley, R.L. and Northcraft, G.B. (1994), â€Å"Conï ¬â€šict frames of reference: implications for dispute processes and outcomes†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 37 No. 1, pp. 193-205. Pondy, L.R. (1966), â€Å"A systems theory of organizational conï ¬â€šict†, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 246-56. Pondy, L.R. (1967), â€Å"Organizational conï ¬â€šict: concepts and models†, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 12 No. 2, pp. 296-320. Pondy, L.R. (1989), â€Å"Reï ¬â€šections on organizational conï ¬â€šict†, Journal of Organizational Change Management, Vol. 2 No. 2, pp. 94-8. Pondy, L.R. (1992a), â€Å"Historical perspectives and contemporary updates†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 253-5. Pondy, L.R. (1992b), â€Å"Reï ¬â€šections on organizational conï ¬â€šict†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 257-61. Priem, R.L. and Price, K.H. (1991), â€Å"Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making†, Group & Organization Studies, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 206-25. Putnem, L. and Poole, M.S. (1987), â€Å"Conï ¬â€šict and negotiation†, in Jablin, F.M., Putnam, L.L., Roberts, K.H. and Porter, L.W. (Eds), Handbook of Organizational Communication, Sage, Newbury Park, CA, pp. 549-99. Reid, D.A., Pullins, E.B., Plank, R.E. and Buehrer, R.E. (2004), â€Å"Measuring buyers’ perceptions of conï ¬â€šict in business-to-business sales interactions†, The Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, Vol. 19 No. 4, pp. 236-49. Saavedra, R., Earley, P.C. and Van Dyne, L. (1993), â€Å"Complex interdependence in task-performing groups†, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78 No. 1, pp. 61-73. Sessa, V. (1996), â€Å"Using perspective taking to manage conï ¬â€šict and affect in teams†, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, Vol. 32 No. 1, pp. 101-15. A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory 199 IJCMA 21,2 200 Schwenk, C.R. (1990), â€Å"Effects of devil’s advocacy and dialectical inquiry on decision making: a meta-analysis†, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 161-77. Sheppard, B.H. (1992), â€Å"Conï ¬â€šict research as Schizophrenia: the many faces of organizational conï ¬â€šict†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 325-34. Schulz-Hardt, S., Jochims, M. and Frey, D. (2002), â€Å"Productive conï ¬â€šict in group decision making: genuine and contrived dissent as strategies to counteract biased information seeking†, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 88 No. 2, pp. 563-86. Simons, T.L. and Peterson, R.S. (2000), â€Å"Task conï ¬â€šict and relationship conï ¬â€šict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust†, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 85 No. 1, pp. 102-11. Sternberg, R.J. and Soriano, L.J. (1984), â€Å"Styles of conï ¬â€šict resolution†, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 47 No. 1, pp. 115-21. Tellefsen, T. and Eyuboglu, N. (2002), â€Å"The impact of a salesperson’s in-house conï ¬â€šicts and inï ¬â€šuence attempts on buyer commitment†, Journal of Personal Selling & Sales Management, Vol. 22 No. 3, pp. 157-72. Thomas, K.W. (1992), â€Å"Conï ¬â€šict and conï ¬â€šict management: reï ¬â€šections and update†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 265-74. Thomas, K.W. (1976), â€Å"Conï ¬â€šict and conï ¬â€šict management†, in Dunnette, M.D. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, Rand McNally, Chicago, IL, pp. 889-935. Van de Vliert, E., Nauta, A., Euwema, M.C. and Janssen, O. (1997), â€Å"The effectiveness of mixing problem solving and forcing†, Using Conï ¬â€šict in Organizations, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, pp. 38-52. Van de Vliert, E., Nauta, A., Giebels, E. and Janssen, O. (1999), â€Å"Constructive conï ¬â€šict at work†, Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 475-91. Walker, O.C., Churchill, G.A. Jr and Ford, N.M. (1975), â€Å"Organizational determinants of the industrial salesman’s role conï ¬â€šict and ambiguity†, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 39 No. 1, pp. 32-9. Wall, V.D. Jr and Nolan, L.L. (1986), â€Å"Perceptions of inequity, satisfaction, and conï ¬â€šict in task-oriented groups†, Human Relations, Vol. 39 No. 11, pp. 1033-52. Weingart, L.R., Thompson, L.L., Bazerman, H.H. and Caroll, J.S. (1990), â€Å"Tactical behavior and negotiation outcomes†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 7-31. Further reading Amason, A.C., Hochwarter, W.A., Thompson, K.R. and Harrison, A.W. (1995), â€Å"Conï ¬â€šict: an important dimension in successful management teams†, Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 24 No. 2, pp. 20-35. Blake, R.R. and Mouton, J.S. (1964), The Managerial Grid, Gulf Publishing Co., Houston, TX. De Dreu, C. and Weingart, L.R. (2003), â€Å"Task versus relationship conï ¬â€šict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: a meta-analysis†, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 88 No. 4, pp. 741-9. Deutsch, M. (1973), The Resolution of Conï ¬â€šict, Yale University Press, New Haven, CT. Friedman, R., Tidd, S., Currall, S. and Tsai, J. (2000), â€Å"What goes around comes around: the impact of personal conï ¬â€šict style on work conï ¬â€šict and stress†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 11 No. 1, pp. 32-55. Guerra, M.J., Martinez, I., Munduate, L. and Medina, F.J. (2005), â€Å"A contingency perspective on the study of the consequences of conï ¬â€šict types: the role of organizational culture†, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 157-76. Lewicki, R.J. and Sheppard, B.H. (1985), â€Å"Choosing how to intervene: factors affecting the use of process and outcome control in third party dispute resolution†, Journal of Occupational Behavior, Vol. 6 No. 1, pp. 49-64. Tidd, S.T., McIntyre, H. and Friedman, R.A. (2004), â€Å"The importance of role ambiguity and trust in conï ¬â€šict perception: unpacking the task conï ¬â€šict to relationship conï ¬â€šict linkage†, International Journal of Conï ¬â€šict Management, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 364-84. About the authors  ´ James Speakman is Assistant Professor of International Negotiation at IESEG Business School, a member of Catholic University of Lille, where his attentions are focused on sales and negotiation. After working for 16 years in key account management sales he completed his PhD research at Cranï ¬ eld School of Management, where, using the Critical Incident Technique with an Interpretive Framework for coding to investigate intraorganizational, interpersonal conï ¬â€šict and the behavioral sequences adopted in the management of these complex interpersonal, intraorganizational conï ¬â€šict episodes. Other research interests include personal selling, past, present and future, where he conducted the US research for a multinational study on the future of personal selling and negotiation in context where his research interests include multi-cultural negotiation. James Speakman is the corresponding author and can be contacted at: I.Speakman@IESEG.FR Lynette Ryals specializes in key account management and marketing portfolio management, particularly in the area of customer proï ¬ tability. She is a Registered Representative of the London Stock Exchange and a Fellow of the Society of Investment Professionals. She is the Director of Cranï ¬ eld’s Key Account Management Best Practice Research Club, Director of the Demand Chain Management community and a member of Cranï ¬ eld School of Management’s Governing Executive. To purchase reprints of this article please e-mail: reprints@emeraldinsight.com Or visit our web site for further details: www.emeraldinsight.com/reprints A re-evaluation of conï ¬â€šict theory 201

Television Has Changed Our Lives - 1592 Words

Television has been an everyday experience on most people’s lives for the last 80 years. Over these years it has changed the way people see the world and how people got their news. It has changed people socially; it has sparked fads and fashion. With radio people were not worried about their appearances or how the listener saw things. All of the radio listeners had were their imagination, television helped conceive what characters actually looked like on the shows. People, including myself, have their favorite programs and enjoy talking about them with others. Television has changed the way that society views things and it was the precursor to the internet and allowed people to see things from all over the world, every night the nightly news would bring all these things to everyone’s living rooms. It also effected how Americans became consumers through commercials. It has served as an information resource, an escape, and an educational tool as well, and it is even said to have won an election for JFK. Television is a very powerful part of communications and a very important technology in changing society and history. Before the Kennedy presidency, television was far behind print journalism in terms of sources audiences relied upon for news. But soon, people relied on TV news for the day s headlines as well as information on American troops in Vietnam, particularly the numbers of those killed or wounded. When something major happened on TV, it affected the whole country atShow MoreRelatedHow Has Television Changed Our Lives? Essay719 Words   |  3 PagesAlla December 8, 2012 English 4061-3 Joseph Mitchell Marques Topic: How has television changed our lives? A. Television a.) Educational b.) Entertainment c.) Informative II. Positive effects of television * Gives information for viewers. * Teach people how to live in their lives. * To see different cultures. * Educates people in a precise way. III. Negative effects of television * It teaches the children to be stupid by using pranks or comedy. *Read MoreMedia s Influence On Society1256 Words   |  6 Pagescompletely changed the world we live in and are now a part of our everyday lives (Bookman, 64). With television, radio, newspapers, books, etc†¦ working their way into our everyday lives it is almost impossible to live without the media. Along with it being persuasive, informative and a great source for entertainment, it also has a large binding influence on societies all over the world. Media aspects are radically reshaping the world (Marina 240) and though some may argue that media has more negativeRead MoreMedia s Influence On Society1269 Words   |  6 Pagesthings, it has completely changed the world and is now a part of our everyday lives (Bookman, 64). With television, radio, newspapers, books, etc†¦ working their way into our everyday lives it is impossible to live without the media today. Along with it being persuasive, informational and a great source for entertainment it also has a large binding influence on societies all over the world. Media aspects are radically reshaping the world (Marina 240) and though some may argue that media has more negativeRead MoreThe Media And Its Impact On Society1669 Words   |  7 Pagesbelieve. Therefore we need to be aware that our own lives are not tainted in a negative way through this communication between ourselves and an industry trying to diminish our sense of individuality and shape us into what they themselves want. My research delves into the in-depth processes in which messages are delivered to our eyes and ears, through the news, newspapers, magazines and radio in what the effects of the conglomeration of these corporations has on us as a society and especially on children’sRead MoreEvolution Of Television And The Vanquish Of Human Value987 Words   |  4 Pages Evolution of Television and the Vanquish of Human Value For years now, television has been invading the homes of families and subtly damaging the family rituals. From black and white to color and high definition, television has changed. Television has changed in appearance, and has changed in how it plays a role in families’ lives. A few years ago, many families did not own a T.V set and now it is almost as if it’s competition to see who watches more T.V, or who has the most and better TRead MoreHum 176 Wk 2 Media Convergence Worksheet1041 Words   |  5 PagesAnswers What is meant by the term media convergence with regard to technology, and how has it affected everyday life? The term media convergence with regards to technology is defined as a process of combining together the telecommunications and computers and turning them into one electronic or digital form. The media convergence has affected our everyday life as we know it in many ways, you can now watch television shows, listen to music and shop online using your computer all without leaving the privacyRead MoreHow Should One Define The American Identity?1642 Words   |  7 Pagesand religion. Our common values, ideas, and beliefs depend on the core structure of the American government: the Constitution, which provides freedom, equality, and independence. Since America is very diverse due to the constant flow of immigrants from all over the world, there is no such thing as being a pure American. Everyone’s background lies somewhere else. Therefore, our identity would be defined by our common ideology and common values instead of our ethnicity and religion. Our common valuesRead MoreAmusing Ourselves to Death: Public Discourse in the AGe of Show Business570 Words   |  3 Pageseverybody knows it, and everything has been written about it. Let me write some more. Postmans book caused a lot of public discussion in the mid-eighties, but it is now as relevant as ever, possibly more so. Today, it has almost become an axiom of our society that the answer to the questions raised by our technological advances lie in the application of further technology, some of it undeveloped and possibly speculative as of now. In the field of media, this has led to the hypothesis that the messagesRead MoreWhat is Mass Media?917 Words   |  4 Pagesmass media: Television Radio Movies Newspaper Internet Importance of Mass Media in Society Mass media is important in society because it reflects the lives, roles, and interests of the people. The media creates the culture and these messages promote not only products, but moods, attitudes, and a sense of what is and what is not important. People rely on mass media in their everyday lives for personal, business, family, and leisurely use (CliffNotes). Mass media sets a standard for what our society shouldRead MoreMedia Influence Mass Media795 Words   |  4 PagesMass Media and the Influence on America and Television By. Mozelle Jones HUMANITIES In real life, we are in Mass Media and we did not even know it. Everything from you learning to just leisure involvement. The cultural products that influence mass media and has taking part is Net Flix. It has made an impact on the movie business where television can be used to see movies and mass media. Television still has an impact on cultural meanings. It shows us the news, ads, and movies that change

International Business Management Kalzip Roofing Pte Ltd - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 9 Words: 2711 Downloads: 2 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Management Essay Type Narrative essay Did you like this example? International Business Management à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" Kalzip Roofing Pte Ltd Introduction Objective Moving towards global market The theories Application of theories to the situation- Global Market Entry Strategy Indirect Exporting Direct Exporting Licensing Joint venture Direct Investment Acquisition Conclusion Recommendation Introduction Kalzip Roofing Pte Ltd does manufacture of roofing equipment and installation solution. Founded in the UK, kalzip roofing was established in the installation market since 1968. And since then the very first well-known assignment was Numberg Concert Theater, in today there are over 80 millions square feetà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s of the company roofing is installed all around the world. Furthermore, the company headquarter manufacturing plant located in Germany and till today is still on high operation. The Company has different similar factory set up across Asia Pacific, UK and United State and that exclude the sales office. Till today, the company is optimistic to open up more newly develop technology and moving towards better future. As part of the region business, in Asia pacific Singapore was used to store material as a warehouse usage purpose. And as per the financial report shown that the business entity is not in a profitable sh ape when the business entity was hit by financial difficulty. It was taken into consideration by Tata Steel to buy the firm from Corus Group and finally the decision was taken to execute the purchase. The entire acquisition took about 1 year. Presently the business turnover that generate revenue is spite into 75%/25% each of the respective owner. The number of employees who employed under Singapore down from 102 to 30. With the major downsizing of operational team due to the incompetency of the planner. Objective Kalzip roofing objective is to use restructured Singapore operation to figure out market opportunities in some of the undeveloped Asian countries. Kalzip is conscious of the business in need to improve their propensity and wherewithal to excel in today markets. Moving forward, the group will be working with few external adviser to become more wiser in gathering market information and expand their business to the global market. The company wish to use Singapore a s a stepping platform to other non-business operated countries in Asia pacific. The business development team propose an favourable and profitability country like Myanmar. The management team need to bout and comprehend the unknown market and establish a suitable market entry game plan. Moving towards global market The right tools to establish a global game plan is to comprehend growing economic and expertise replica (John Legend, 2003). This assignment discusses the multiple aspects of international business. à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The global business marketing game plan is reached tough with external fluctuating such as market act procedures. With all these obstruction to entry it would seem that a global marketing game plan is almost unsustainable (Jason M Gelsmino) Companies with strong global game plan have outstand over market schedule that only compete in local markets. Some edges notwithstanding pliability, miscellany, assortment and workable cost of the actual product an d customer satisfaction. As market strategy become more recognise with global marketing schedule their aptness to belittle and downplay the barrier to new entry swell. Marketing game plan address some typical problems that companies have encounter in the past when coming across with global market; such as sales and market level, quality control of the finished goods, and timeline issues, tools advance and the today network allowed market to weld in local market at any time. This is an rewards as it provide a high degree of mould ability/stretchability and upward customer service level (Jason M Gelsmino) A medium sized company to be global business contestant need to be more advantageously before obtained any provocation global start-up faces 3 dares. Firstly are the organizational issues and transcendental issues generated by distance and by dissimilarity in culture, globalization, education evolution levels. Even adopting to the new workweek can be quite texting for small firm e mployees when come to his/her first day at work. (Greco, John A.Jr, 2005). Secondly is superintend the setback (and moment) of affair à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" that is, the divergent nations political, regulatory, forensic, tax and employment environments. Thirdly, newly venture business will find their ways to participate with much bigger firms with far lesser resources. To prosper, companies must state coherent their rational for going global, learn to build network with more established business associate, shine at local market and produce a multinational enlightenment within the organization (Hutt, Michael D., Speh, Thomas W. 2004). Strive for capturing international Business When a company makes a determination to enter a new environment or market, there are variegated issues that need to run through. There are but not limited to cost liabilities, business risk and the degree of authority which can be utilized. The straightforward and manageable method of entering the market is usually exporting, using undeviating- agency or concomitant technique à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" counter trade. On the other hand, there are more labyrinthine forms include but not limited to joint ventures with developed business partner. à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Labrinthine forms include truly global operations which may involve joint ventures, or export processing zones. Having decided on the form of export strategy, decisions have to be made on the specific channels. (Market Entry Strategy, 1997) The Theories Contrivance vital structure for finding resources The theories talk about above portray a concise imagine of the main component that a company should though about when gauging what markets to penetrate and market to do analysis. These theories may also be functional in rating which market entering portray survey of target market, quiescent challenger, SWOT analysis and constitution to enter preferred market. For the business their prefatory juncture of trade, global growth ch oice and assistant with commercial and supply chain classical (Armstong M.A, 2006). A SWOT scrutiny is done to assess the Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats intricate in Kalzip roofing business. It intricate itemize the target of the business or project and recognize the internal and external element that are appreciative and antagonistic to obtain those goals. Appreciative element as well as antagonistic element is used to peruse corporation and outward abode (Chermack, Thomas J, 2007) Application of theories to the situation Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "International Business Management Kalzip Roofing Pte Ltd" essay for you Create order Strength Weaknesses Opportunities Threats Kalzip develop its own roofing via its own manufacturing facilities and to gain much higher safety standards, the group has innumerable initiative that was newly created and driven by the respective Health and Safety professional within each region. The workforce of the roofing industry today, is much more educated at a higher level Based on the global division of workforce skills of new equipment and ideas. Strengths for processes of the business, purchasing and input notwithstanding: Good quota of raw materials. Due to competitive advantage today, there are many well established roofing multinational company situated across Asia pacific region. Currency fluctuation à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å"Many professional secrete definite output from acquire bureau to it dishonest to original customer hard foreign currencies were highly pursue after, while particularly and exceedingly value Western item perform as a method of corruption in communist palatinate, such as Romania, where a particular band of cigarettes served as an unsubstantiated comprehensively used cash to purchase goods and service. Some service workers even took up alternative side income dishonestly furnish service post-haste to consumer for payment. The likelihood ahead for the roofing industry are à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" topographical ranking of the country (effortless entry to Europe, Russia and Turkic republics) enlarge connection with the regional countries, the low level of handful to these markets so far. The business today continue to explore new opportunities via apportionment and enlarges/swell economic relation and escalate the business to other industry such as oil and gas and shipyard . The agonize is that the international / worldwide pecuniary crisis has reduced its confidence in the fate and raise glom about the current. Fast broadening / thickening eased exasperation with unscrupulous politicians and demanding environment. It proffer at least the chance of superior health care and pedagogy and andragogy which lagging much behind as compared with Europe standards. But the average dwindle in GDP this year is a significantly dropped 8.2%. convalescence is await o be slow. So much rather the east Europeans face much higher taxes, heavy debts, lower spending power and lesser jobs. This is why in the eye of the investor à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“The production surmise of danger would include : The affair of state wobbly country, lack of amenity, sparse, exorbitant/extortionate, temporary, high risk investment. A poor resemblance for the country imports and exports procedures. Erratic and rickety and inadequate buildout of free trade rules and procedures. . Global market entry strategy Based on (Malht, Aarwal Ulgado, 2003) the pick of foreign market entry strategies is an important portion of the internationalisation operation for companies today. The entry mode a company select for a foreign market has significant leverage on the extent to which the company exploit on market potential and on the strategic predominance it has over market progress. These entry modes include importing and exporting, the use of representative and purveyor, promised deals such as allowing sublease and franchising, JV, strategic co-relation, and wholly owned foreign direct investment (FDI). This paper will try to rank one another of these entry modes, exploring the benefit and drawback of each market entry game plan and can become a high restriction to the worldwide market. Price cuddle search and haggle costs. Fleshly interval, language restriction, warehouse costs and risk limit the undeviating observe of market leaders. Implementation of agreement m ay be expensive and feeble legal amalgamation between countries creating more and more tough condition. Also, these elements are important when bearing in mind a market entry strategy. In actual all these may be so expensive and risky that Governments, rather than private personnel, often get intricate in commodity system. Figure 1 and 2 below (Market entry strategies, 1999) The evaluation of the market for an artefact or favour, counting the investigation and survey of market treads, determine the contention, and manage/direct market research is important. As market research has already done in previous section of this assessment, few key business game plan to enter the market using the model above figure 1 and 2 which identified the next level and chase new market need to traverse and plan outside own original business zone. It decide for erudition and conclusion and settlement making on how to answer new rivalry, customers, JV partner, contractors and other market p layers à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å" at higher performance and in unconventional domain (Market entry strategies 1999). Indirect Exporting This technique of foreign market entry includes the exporting builder engaging an individualistic/stand-alone companies, which becomes the export section for the marker. Indirect export often to be said is a domestic sales (Yoshino MY and Rangan U.S ,1995). Maker finish domestic sale that in returning to an export sale revenue a third party (Foley J, 1999). In the simple term, indirect export elaborate selling to the person who do export. Direct Exporting The unalike between indirect and direct exporting is that, the maker execute the entire export process rather than emissary to others. The exporting companies deal with every characteristic of the export operation from market scrutiny and handling paperwork to foreign dispensation and collect payments. In cases like Kalzip to enter the other region market may be a concoction of indirect and direct exporting and may obtain with assemblage sequel. As in the start-up process kalzip may incur less cost in the early stage of entry. The representative trustee will help the company like kalzip to establish the clubbable and good-natured image and absorb about the local venture market. Acquire confess about the market and then without hurrying establish the businesses. Licensing Bases on (Johansson, 1997) licensing include à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“offering a foreign company the rights to use formà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s proprietary technology and other know how normally in return for a fee plus a royal on proceed and incomeà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚ . The licensor may give the licensee the prerogative and privilege to use the company charter and copyright on a specific goods or a process, creator know-how, tech specialized guidance and helps, after sales advice, or the use of the emblem or the firm name (Hollensen, 1998). The duration of the licences may very much dependable, as mentioned by (Jeannet Hennessey, 2004) be contingent on the level of venture/speculation needed by the licensee to entry into the market. It is always the norm for the licensee who make all the needed capital investment with regards to equipment, marketing disbursement etc. Neither party may insist on a long and robust agreement in to generate the cost of investment and speculation. Joint Venture A JV partner with a local associate constitute a more large-scale and sizeable form of involvement in foreign market than whichever exporting or licensing. A JV is distinguisher from other forms of calculated and deliberate agreements as an associate generate a separate legal entity (Cateora Graham, 2002) raised 4 factors analogous with JV: à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“JV are enchanted, unconnected, legal entitiesà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“They confess intent by associate to tell in management of the joint ventureà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“They are coalition between permissible joining entities such as private coporation, Public sector or government agency and not in the middle with individuals. à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã…“Justness position are held by each associateà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã‚  A JV may be the one and only method for company to merge into a country if authority agreement debate practices regularly and habitually approbation Local Corporation or if laws interdict foreign control but allow JVs. Alongside control diplomatic/party political and pecuniary risk, JV gives a lesser risk as compared with the rest. In JV the value and threat are going to be much lower, shield resources that canà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢t be achieved via the market. Companies have ameliorate access to monetary capital, ease of economies of structure and satisfaction of size. They also may have admittance to new skills and management procedures. There are 6 different kinds of JVs obtainable to companies and these are outlined below.  · Direct Investment (Greenfield investments)  · Acquisitions Somewhat than inaugurate an undisputedly possess ancillary from scratch the firms can contemplate an accession of an existing company. Accession offer swift entry into a market and more often furnish access to broadcast telegraph of message. To encapsulate this assignment, I have developed a models defining the advantages and disadvantage of each foreign market entry game plan. Conclusion The assortment of a market entry game plan is disparaging to the prosperity of a company investment and venture operations. Each of the company on prosperity, The selection of a market entry strategy is critical to the success of a firmà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s foreign operations. Each firm planning on internationalising has a differing set of circumstances. These circumstances can be either internal or external to the firm. Internal circumstances include availability of resources, experience of staff and spirit of entrepreneurship. External circumstances include size of home marke t, attractiveness of foreign markets, and political conditions in foreign markets to name but a few. These circumstances determine the suitability of the different market entry strategies. The selection of a market entry strategy is critical to the success of a firmà ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â€ž ¢s foreign operations. Each firm planning on internationalising has a differing set of circumstances. These circumstances can be either internal or external to the firm. Internal circumstances include availability of resources, experience of staff and spirit of entrepreneurship. External circumstances include size of home market, attractiveness of foreign markets, and political conditions in foreign markets to name but a few. These circumstances determine the suitability of the different market entry strategies. Reference John Legend, Business Marketing Association (2003) Greco, John A. Jr., (2005) Past indicates promising future for b-to-b direct; Hutt, Michael D., Speh, Thomas W. (2004)Busin ess Marketing Management: A Strategic View of Industrial and Organizational Markets, 8th Edition Armstrong. M. A handbook of Human Resource Management Practice (10th edition) 2006, Kogan Page , Chermack, Thomas J.; Bernadette K. Kasshanna (December 2007). The Use of and Misuse of SWOT analysis and implications for HRD professionals.Human Resource Development International10(4): 383à ¢Ã¢â€š ¬Ã¢â‚¬Å"399.. Malhotra, N. K., Agarwal, J. Ulgado, F. M. (2003) Internationalization and entry modes: A multitheoretical framework and research propositions. Journal of International Marketing, 11(4), pp. 1-31. Yoshino, M. Y.; Rangan, U. S. (1995), Strategic alliances: an entrepreneurial approach to globalization, Harvard Business Press Foley, J. (1999), The Global Entrepreneur: taking your business international Age, Dearborn Johansson, J. (1997) Global marketing : Foreign Entry, Local Marketing, and Global Management. Chicago, Irwin. Hollensen, S. (1998) Global marketing : A Market-Responsive Approach. London, Prentice Hall. Jeannet, J.-P. Hennessey, D. (2004) Global Marketing Strategies. Boston, Houghton Mifflin. Cateora, P. Graham, J. (2002) International Marketing. NY, McGraw-Hill.